🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.