🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart nuclear discussions with Washington as long as it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared new appeals had come from mediators to reopen talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran was not yet able to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to access attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Walking a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is treading a complex route since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be proceeding from a situation of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more powerful defensively and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Prior Talks Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been obliterated. Afterward, EU nations employed their right to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Proposed

Tehran representatives said they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed three times they had reached agreement with the US representative the US official only for the agreement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Present Position

Iran's diplomats stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems very probable the offer could be reintroduced in various formats if negotiations restart.

The US president last week said he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to resume discussions, but in private Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting consistent overtures from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of passivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Stance

In his remarks to the conference, intended to paint the US as a dominant force that misuses the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He stated the assaults started with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making confidence difficult to restore.

Diplomacy Remains the Final Answer

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had repeatedly attempted to enforce their will during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be viable and continues the final solution to settle conflicts, but its standards, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"In case they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of dignity and respect, they will obtain a answer in the identical approach."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We acquired numerous insights from this war; we have discovered our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to eliminate, stays intact. The installations and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to destroy. The nation of Iran have developed more resilient, more integrated, and more backing of the government and the nation in the aftermath of this assault."